Diamond Flap

There is some excitement in Russia concerning the discovery of diamonds from a lava of the Tolbachik volcano in the Kamchatka peninsula near Alaska. These diamonds were formed from pressurised volcanic gases under the influence of electrical discharges of lightning during eruption, this particular case being the 2012-2013 eruption.

But you need to keep matters in perspective because on closer examination these diamonds are ‘micro-diamonds’ ranging in size from 250 to 700 microns in size and identified from electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction; not exactly the size you would put on a ring, or in the argot, bloody smaller than Indian goods. (A micron is one millionth of a metre so describing these diamonds in weight terms, carats, would be futile). De Beers is under no threat.

The article linked above from the Siberian Times  uses the usual mainstream plate-tectonics model, not drawn to scale either, and it’s quite simplistic.

The fact is that large gem quality diamonds, think of the Cullinan Diamond from the Premier Mine, are restricted to kimberlites on stable continental cratons. This is the De Beers model which has not yet been falsified, and a rule of thumb was the Hawthorne-Hissink model in that you find kimberlites where you find them, a model that assaulted the sensitivities of most geologists who fervently believe that kimberlites have to be structurally controlled and thus potentially predictable and targetable.

This model is based on the standard diamond stability plot.

Hence the De Beers model was that diamonds are the stable phase at 220 km depth and that ‘somehow’ they were carried up as xenocrysts in a kimberlite magma during a very short travel time, necessary to preserve the diamond in contact with the olivine rich magma during its ascent to the surface. Kimberlite are also known to be super-charged with CO2 during eruption, and the mechanism of diatreme formation described by the Scott-Smith theory, that I have suggested is due to downward machining Birkeland currents.

The Russian report also mentions a French patent for synthetic diamond production using methane (CH4) and high voltage electrical discharges. General Electric and De Beers also manufacture synthetic diamonds and these are cheaper to manufacture than to actually mine them.

One of the puzzles of diamond geology is the occurrence of diamonds away from the stable continental cratons such as the Nullagine diamonds in the West Australian Pilbara and the Copeton diamonds in New South Wales, found in Quaternary alluvial deposits, (or whatever label the geochronological nomenclature body has used for this age period).

The problem is that the Nullagine and Copeton diamonds have not been traced to a primary source rock. Similar mysteries occur elsewhere on the Earth where alluvial diamonds in the SW of South Africa (Annex Kleinzee for example) had an unknown provenance and one suggestion was that these diamonds came from Brazil before South America was separated from Africa. (However it was not a convincing explanation, come to think of it, and a more logical explanation was that these diamonds were derived from perhaps a tributary of the Orange River in the past, or some other palaeodrainage whose catchment was the Kimberley diamond field to the east in South Africa). The belief for the NSW occurrences, is that these were produced by a plate-tectonics subduction process without the necessity of deep sourced magmas such as kimberlite or lamproite.

But what about the Russian discovery? An excellent summary of the 2012-2013 eruption of ‘andesites’ may be studied here.

kamchatka-volcano

Plosky Tolbachik eruption showing lightning

Given CH4 and CO2 as gaseous components of the Kamchatka type volcanoes, then coupled with the observed electrical discharges, formation of micro-diamonds becomes quite plausible. However the formation of macro-diamonds, 11 points and above (100 points to a carat) requires a long period of crystallisation and cannot be explained by the short-term eruptive process observed at the Tolbachik eruptions. These had to have formed during the geological past, and then the question arises of whether the carbon they formed from originated at the surface and were plunged into the mantle, or developed in-situ in the mantle in the first instance. The explanation for this then involves the fundamental principles of the origin of life, is it an epiphenomenon of physical reality, the existing paradigm, or is it as Amit Goswami and others suspect, that physical reality is an epiphenomenon of life/consciousness.

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. I spent my professional life looking for mineral deposits, found some, and also located a number of kimberlites in NSW and Western Australia. Exploration geology is the closest one can get to practicing the scientific method, mineral exploration always being concerned with finding anomalous geophysical or geochemical data, framing a model and explanation for the anomaly and then testing it with drilling or excavation. All scientific theories are ultimately false since they invariably involved explaining something with incomplete extant knowledge. Since no one is omniscient or knows everything, so too scientific theories which are solely limited to existing knowledge. Because the future always yields new data, scientific theories must change to be compatible with the new data. Thus a true scientist is never in love with any particular theory, always knowing that when the facts change, so too must he/she change their minds.
This entry was posted in Geology and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Diamond Flap

  1. fabio says:

    Excuse my ignorance but in these analysis isn’t possible to falsify diamond provenance by who has the market controlling ?

    Like

  2. Not really – when I worked for De Beers exploration was totally unaffected by marketing department. Too many myths and conspiracies over DB – but no one has found a kimberlite hosting 500 carat stones plus off the stable cratons. So it’s earth evolutionary theory that needs to be correctly understood, hence my final paragraph.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s