TV Reception and Electromagnetic Wind

It is a general observation where I live that strong winds affect television reception. This implies that winds have some sort of electromagnetic property that distorts the EM signal being received by the TV antenna. The stronger the wind, the more the TV signal is affected.

Winds are horizontal flows of atmosphere, either hot or cold. These movements cannot be produced by gravity as gravity has no component in the horizontal plane though some impressive intellectual gymnastics are performed to explain wind as an atmospheric phenomena founded in gravity and thermal solar activity. An alternative mechanism must be sought.

However as the presence of high velocity winds seems to be an electromagnetic effect, this implies that moving electrically charged particles are the motive force behind wind, as recently suggested by Gerald H. Pollack. Pollack proposed that emission of protons from water into the atmosphere coupled with the rotation of the Earth causes lateral electrical charge heterogeneities and that winds are the effect of continuous lateral movement of those charges in some sort of dynamic equilibrium. He has also proposed that it is this solar induced charge separation that rotates the earth since the jet streams and winds seem to move west to east, dragging the Earth behind them. Perhaps.

But it is clear that winds are the result of horizontal movements of plasma in the dark mode, dragging neutral matter, here the atmosphere, along with it as the Earth maintains its dynamic electrical equilibrium. This mechanism is conspicuous by its absence in current (pun intended) atmospheric physics, and hence climate change theory.

The climate models don’t work because we have the basic physics wrong.

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. I spent my professional life looking for mineral deposits, found some, and also located a number of kimberlites in NSW and Western Australia. Exploration geology is the closest one can get to practicing the scientific method, mineral exploration always being concerned with finding anomalous geophysical or geochemical data, framing a model and explanation for the anomaly and then testing it with drilling or excavation. All scientific theories are ultimately false since they invariably involved explaining something with incomplete extant knowledge. Since no one is omniscient or knows everything, so too scientific theories which are solely limited to existing knowledge. Because the future always yields new data, scientific theories must change to be compatible with the new data. Thus a true scientist is never in love with any particular theory, always knowing that when the facts change, so too must he/she change their minds.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s