Losing My Religion

Michael Jensen, a leading Christian cleric in Australia has penned an interesting opinion in the Spectator Australia online “Flat White” section titled “I don’t believe in ‘no religion’. He means that if you tick the box for religious affiliation in the forthcoming Australian national census this year, you will be lying, because he believes there is no such thing as a non-religious human being.

Que?

The argument hinges around what is meant by religion.

He refers to a US scholar William T Cavanaugh arguing in his book ‘The Myth of Religious Violence – Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict’ that there is little agreement about what a religion actually is.

Really? I’ll help.

A religious person is one who is identified by a dogmatic belief that has been permanently etched or embedded in their memory by the process of repetition of fixed patterns of thinking or ideas. Rote learning of holy scripture or ideas until it becomes habitual.

A religious person is one who is thus locked into a particular habit of thinking which is no different to a computer program.

For the religious person authority, whether God, Allah, Gaia, State, Guru, is absolute. Absolute in the sense of a computer program that cannot be challenged or will not work if the wrong input is performed.

A religious person is then one who has become enslaved by a particular pattern of thinking. So yes Jensen is right that all of us seem to be captured by one or other beliefs. Or so he believes.

But he blundered when he mocked the late John Lennon who apparently asked us to imagine no religion.

What Lennon might have been saying is that imagine no thought.

I suspect Jensen might need to rethink his opinion because he seems still trapped in his religious cage that thinking has created for him. Being entrapped himself, he logically assumes the rest of us must also be. Not necessarily.

Religious people are those who cannot change their minds when the facts change. Jensen demonstrates this with his article.

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. I spent my professional life looking for mineral deposits, found some, and also located a number of kimberlites in NSW and Western Australia. Exploration geology is the closest one can get to practicing the scientific method, mineral exploration always being concerned with finding anomalous geophysical or geochemical data, framing a model and explanation for the anomaly and then testing it with drilling or excavation. All scientific theories are ultimately false since they invariably involved explaining something with incomplete extant knowledge. Since no one is omniscient or knows everything, so too scientific theories which are solely limited to existing knowledge. Because the future always yields new data, scientific theories must change to be compatible with the new data. Thus a true scientist is never in love with any particular theory, always knowing that when the facts change, so too must he/she change their minds.
This entry was posted in Philosophy. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s