Identity Politics

Just watched News Corp. journalist Andrew Bolt interview P.J. O’Rourke here during which, inter alia, identity politics was discussed.

I’ve never really thought much, if at all, about identity politics dismissing it is some progressive inanity. Then clarity appeared.

If, as a political movement, the progressives reject individual rights, and all that this idea implies, then how to deal with rights? By creating collective based rights such as ‘human-rights’ or a right based on one or other identity, whether race, skin colour, sexual orientation or some other differentiating characteristic.

The creation of the idea of human-rights was a necessary policy by the Progressives for it then enabled them to support ‘rights’ without needing to involve the individual in the idea.

The net result is the Balkanisation of humanity into competing identities, thus creating perpetual civil strife as one identity group competes with another. And a cynic might muse that this balkanisation was purposefully engineered to divide and conquer the masses so that they might be more easily ruled.

And of course as P. J. O’Rourke pointed out, the rejection of personal, or individual, responsibility is part and parcel of the identity political meme.

And then logically it follows that the progressives must reject the notion of individualism inherent in the Christian religion.

Yet the Progressives then admonish us to ‘innovate’; nothing other than the social engineers expecting their robotic creations to suddenly think for themselves.

Allied with this policy is that of the freedom of speech right. But the greatest abusers of the freedom of speech are the Progressives themselves, since conservatives watch their verbal P’s and Q’s as a simple matter of good manners. So who are the foul-mouthed haters expressing their opinions on Facebook or Twitter? The Progressives of course as they dominate the social media outlets.

The stupids really are in charge and this is not good.

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. I spent my professional life looking for mineral deposits, found some, and also located a number of kimberlites in NSW and Western Australia. Exploration geology is the closest one can get to practicing the scientific method, mineral exploration always being concerned with finding anomalous geophysical or geochemical data, framing a model and explanation for the anomaly and then testing it with drilling or excavation. All scientific theories are ultimately false since they invariably involved explaining something with incomplete extant knowledge. Since no one is omniscient or knows everything, so too scientific theories which are solely limited to existing knowledge. Because the future always yields new data, scientific theories must change to be compatible with the new data. Thus a true scientist is never in love with any particular theory, always knowing that when the facts change, so too must he/she change their minds.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Identity Politics

  1. THX1138 says:

    Excellent insight, I agree. You might not hear from me for a good long while, as it looks like I’m having to go homeless. If you gone when I get back, it’s been nice knowing you, and it’s been a wonderful conversation. I hope, though, that I find you again.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s