Gender Neutral Glaciers ???????

Climate Depot has posted details about an academic paper focussing on a search for a gender neutral glacier????

What the academic retards will do to ensure their funding continues and if that’s what’s coming out of Western Universities, then heaven help us

‘In search of a gender neutral glacier’ – ‘Paper proposes a feminist glaciology framework’
in search of a gender neutral glacier’

A critical but overlooked aspect of the human dimensions of glaciers and global change research is the relationship between gender and glaciers. While there has been relatively little research on gender and global environmental change in general (Moosa and Tuana, 2014; Arora-Jonsson, 2011), there is even less from a feminist perspective that focuses on gender (understood here not as a male/female binary, but as a range of personal and social possibilities) and also on power, justice, inequality, and knowledge production in the context of ice, glacier change, and glaciology. Through a review and synthesis of a multi-disciplinary and wide-ranging literature on human-ice relations, this paper proposes a feminist glaciology framework to analyze human-glacier dynamics, glacier narratives and discourse, and claims to credibility and authority of glaciological knowledge through the lens of feminist studies. Feminist glaciology asks how knowledge related to glaciers is produced, circulated, and gains credibility and authority across time and space. Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research, Mark Carey, M Jackson, Alessandro Antonello, Jaclyn Rushing – Progress in Human Geography 1–24, January 10, 2016 thanks to David Hanig

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. Trained by Western Mining Corporation and polished by De Beers.
This entry was posted in Post Modern Inanities, Scientific Stupidities. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Gender Neutral Glaciers ???????

  1. Thx1138 says:

    Well it demonstrates very nicely how so-called science has become a political agenda.


  2. PeterMG says:

    Academia has always been infested with nutters. That they have been allowed to infest science so blatantly will only add to the numbers who chose to only believe what they see.. I know it looks grim for science and so it should, as it is politically driven..

    However here in the UK more and more people realise all is not well. Many may misread what happened in the recent election, but the message the politicos need to take away is that they are all rubbish and at present the people are not prepared to give any party carte blanch to inact their pet agenda’s

    The people of the U.K. first and foremost want control back in Westminster which requires we leave the EU completely. Then we will slowly but surely punish the ruling class for taking the country down such a disastrous path. These moves may not be obvious to to outside observer who has to rely on the media, but I can tell you the people are quietly revolting and the political class are mostly too stupid to see what is happening.

    We do need a good leader for a new party though as none of the existing political parties are fit for purpose.


  3. carefix says:

    I propose that all glaciers should be named after women! After all they are slow, pushy, irrational and with academic qualification deficits. They are also frigid, melting only when they sense money. Icons of Climate Change.


    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s