Living and Deading

Over the decades I have become used to hitting wildlife with a 4WD truck and accidentally deading (to misuse a Blue Bottle neologism – Goon show and all that) the animal.  Not killing but deading. Similarly jumping out of a window of a multi-story dwelling building will also result in one being deaded. Which left me wondering what the difference between a living animal and a deaded animal is; what subtle physical ‘thing’ present in one, the living, and absent in the other, the deaded?

Let us assume everything in the Universe is physically connected to everything else. Let us additionally assume things that are  dead are disconnected from the connected entities, so we have dead things and living things. How then does a living thing become a deaded thing?

(The debate has to remain in the physical, not metaphysical, that religion obsesses over).

Bill Gaede’s Thread Theory offers a possible solution.

Living things are interconnected by Gaede ropes or threads that are, for the purpose of debate here, similar to DNA molecules and electrical Birkeland currents. Living things move and I assume the interconnection is maintained during motion.

When a living thing is suddenly stopped moving by some physical obstruction, say wee bird hitting radiator of moving car, the physical stuff that is the bird becomes disconnected from the rest, ie, the living, by rupture of the Gaedian Threads (GT). This is similar to cutting a rope some one is hanging from that results in that some one being deaded when colliding with…..etc.

But why then does a recently deaded organism start to putrefy? Are not the bacteria inside the organism also disconnected from the living and should thus have been deaded? Or is the solution to this paradox lie in the relative sizes of the shapes of matter that make an organism? Perhaps the bacteria are a substrate of life,  and animals, made from this connected substrate, in a different domain.

A few thoughticals to exercise the imagination(s).

Update: Stated differently, how does one explain the difference between the living from the unliving? Physically, not intellectually.

About Louis Hissink

Retired diamond exploration geologist. I spent my professional life looking for mineral deposits, found some, and also located a number of kimberlites in NSW and Western Australia. Exploration geology is the closest one can get to practicing the scientific method, mineral exploration always being concerned with finding anomalous geophysical or geochemical data, framing a model and explanation for the anomaly and then testing it with drilling or excavation. All scientific theories are ultimately false since they invariably involved explaining something with incomplete extant knowledge. Since no one is omniscient or knows everything, so too scientific theories which are solely limited to existing knowledge. Because the future always yields new data, scientific theories must change to be compatible with the new data. Thus a true scientist is never in love with any particular theory, always knowing that when the facts change, so too must he/she change their minds.
This entry was posted in Hare-brained theories, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Living and Deading

  1. Thx1138 says:

    I’ve begun writing an essay in response to this posting but things have been too hectic for me to finish it yet. Looking forward to having a discussion about it.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s